Funded Projects

Effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of people with opioid use disorder; however, only a small fraction of patients who would benefit from these medications actually use them. Several reasons contribute to low MOUD use, including lack of insurance; lack of knowledge about the medications, both among patients and providers; stigma associated with MOUD; and social norms. Innovative methods are needed to help increase MOUD use. One such option is peer-led interventions that might increase patients’ interest in MOUD. One existing peer-led intervention is the Harnessing Online Peer Education (HOPE) online community intervention that has been designed to reduce stigma and increase health behavior change among stigmatized populations, such as people living with HIV. This project will investigate whether and how HOPE can be adapted for people with opioid use disorder. It will assess whether HOPE can effectively increase MOUD requests, MOUD uptake, and sustained adherence to MOUD as well as reduce overdose rates.  

Exercise could repair structural and functional brain changes caused by opioid use disorder (OUD) and chronic pain by increasing growth and brain-derived neurotrophic factors and promote decreased substance cravings, reduced depression and anxiety, and increased analgesic effects that improve chronic pain. The team’s previous work with Parkinson’s disease and stroke patients showed that “assisted” exercise on a stationary cycle improved motor function and increased dopamine levels. The team also developed a novel self-regulation/cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program that co-addresses opioid addiction and pain (STOP) and improves pain tolerance, cravings, and functional engagement in daily activities. This study will take a multiphase optimization strategy approach to refining intervention protocols, testing feasibility, and evaluating the effects of exercise and STOP as adjunctive treatments to medication-assisted treatment (MAT) in adults with an OUD and chronic pain enrolled in residential treatment programs to decrease drug cravings and pain and increase adherence to MAT.

Stigma is a key barrier to retention in medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder, particularly among low-income, minority individuals. Stigma that exists at multiple levels contributes to poor retention in care, including internalized and anticipated stigma at the individual level, as well as enacted stigma at the health care provider- and community levels. There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate innovative strategies to reduce stigma at these multiple levels among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve engagement in care. One of the most promising strategies to reduce multiple intersecting stigmas simultaneously and improve engagement in care for low-income, minority individuals is through the use of peer recovery coaches (PRCs). PRCs, individuals who have gone through the recovery process themselves and are typically state-certified, have been shown to be more acceptable for engaging and retaining low-income, racial/ethnic minority patients in treatment compared to other health workers. However, scarce research has formally evaluated the effects of PRCs on stigma. This study will test how a PRC model can reduce multiple intersecting stigmas among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve retention in methadone treatment.

This study leverages recent federal and state opioid use disorder treatment initiatives as a platform for testing a promising mind-body intervention, Mindful Awareness in Body-oriented Therapy (MABT) as an adjunct to MAT in two clinical settings funded through the Washington Opioid State Targeted Response (STR) program. MABT, a novel mindfulness-based intervention, uniquely addresses aspects of awareness, interoception, and regulation that may be associated with pain, mental health distress, and behavioral control that increase risk of relapse and poor treatment outcomes. Each setting employs a variation of the nationally recognized Massachusetts Nurse Care Manager model. Using a randomized, two-group, repeated measures design, we will compare those who receive MABT+MAT to MAT only. The overarching goal of this application is to test MABT to improve MAT health outcomes among patients receiving buprenorphine to treat OUD.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly condition. Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is a common mind-body intervention for individuals with LBP. Studies that have supported SMT have generally found relatively small treatment effects. The prior work of this research team has identified two mechanisms explaining the therapeutic effects of SMT: a reduction in spinal stiffness and improved activation of the lumbar multifidus muscle. Our research team has also developed accurate, non-invasive methods to measure these effects and their response to SMT. Our overall goal is to optimize SMT treatment protocols for patients with LBP. In this project, we will use innovative methodology to efficiently evaluate the effects of various individual treatment components toward an overall effect. Results of this project will provide optimized SMT protocols that will be ready for application in future randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT.

Buprenorphine has been shown to be is an effective method for treating Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). However, despite its success, treatment retention rates are notoriously low ? about half of those seeking treatment will have dropped out within the first 6 months. One factor known to negatively impact treatment adherence is stigma. This stigma derives from not only being viewed as individuals with OUD, but even as individuals seeking medications for OUD as these medications often include other forms of opioids. Additionally, individuals with OUD often suffer from other conditions, including psychiatric illness, leading them to live with multiple stigmatized identities. This study will develop tools to assess stigma associated with OUD, seeking medical treatment for OUD, and mental health. This knowledge will then be used to adapt the parent award?s mobile Health intervention intended to overcome stigma barriers and increase adherence to buprenorphine treatment for OUD.

Myofascial pain syndrome is a prevalent and debilitating condition and can aggravate other conditions such as sickle cell disease. This project will use total body imaging using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (TB-PET/CT) to identify and monitor this pain syndrome and potential treatments over time. The research will use TB-PET/CT to assess myofascial tissue effects of chronic low back pain and sickle cell disease pain. The first phase of the project will assess health changes observed by TB-PET/CT imaging in painful and non-painful myofascial tissues compared to healthy myofascial tissue. The second phase of the research will be a randomized, controlled longitudinal interventional study to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture on myofascial pain syndrome, using TB-PET/CT imaging to assess changes.

Chronic pain may be linked to poorer outcomes in those using medication-assisted treatments (MAT) to treat opioid use disorders (OUD). Psychosocial interventions for pain have been effective in patients with chronic pain and substance use disorders, but these interventions have not been thoroughly examined in the OUD population receiving MAT. The study team previously refined and adapted a psychosocial pain management intervention (PPMI) to be delivered by telephone for patients with OUD receiving MAT. The current study will understand the potential applicability of this intervention to other high-risk groups, such as veterans, study the longer-term impact of PPMI, and gather data to inform the implementation of PPMI in MAT patients. This work will provide a robust test of the PPMI intervention to help enhance MAT outcomes in a larger and more representative group of participants while also paving the way for future implementation of interventions to improve MAT retention.

Among the more than half-million adults entering addiction treatment for prescription opioid abuse every year, 50%-60% report co-morbid chronic pain, and 80% report that pain triggers relapse. Individualized/self-stigma among adults with substance abuse has been shown to lead to delayed recovery, increased relapse and reduced treatment-related attendance. Stigma may induce significant burden on patients with OUD and chronic pain and there may be unique characteristics of stigma for this population due to the overlap between medical treatment and substance abuse. Multiple sources of stigma may be imposed including internalized/self-stigma as well as intragroup/peer-to-peer (?horizontal?) stigma whereby peers impose stigma upon each other based on the type and severity of past drug use. Furthermore, stigma could be ?vertical? in that stigma may be enacted by health care providers or by treatment center staff. However, there is notably a lack of research and related assessment tools to measure these multidimensional facets of stigma, particularly in patients with OUD and chronic pain. The investigators will utilize a mixed-methods approach to evaluate internalized/self-stigma, anticipated/expected stigma and enacted stigma using existing standardized surveys, and to describe horizontal and vertical stigma in individuals with OUD and pain at multiple sites. In addition, the investigators will integrate the quantitative and qualitative information to help inform modifications to the psychotherapy component (I-STOP) of the parent award intervention, which would then also target multidimensional stigma in patients with OUD and chronic pain.

Back pain is the most common chronic pain diagnosis and the most common diagnosis for which opioids are prescribed. Clinical practice guidelines make it clear that nonpharmacologic treatments are preferable to opioids for patients with back pain. Despite clear evidence, over-prescribing of opioids to individuals with back pain continues. Providers of nonpharmacologic care are often absent or unreachable from rural and low-income communities and patients with limited financial resources. Many rural and low-income communities are served by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that are at the forefront of the opioid crisis, but often lack adequate options to provide accessible nonpharmacologic treatments. This pragmatic clinical trial will compare the effectiveness of different telehealth strategies to provide effective nonpharmacologic interventions to overcome the barriers specific to serving rural and low-income communities. The trial will evaluate two strategies, one providing both a brief pain teleconsult with phone-based physical therapy, the other uses an adaptive strategy ? providing the brief pain teleconsult first, followed by phone-based physical therapy to those who need additional treatment. The study will also evaluate outcomes related to the efforts to implement strategies in FQHC clinics. This research will provide a toolkit for future efforts to make nonpharmacological interventions for back pain available in other low resource health care settings.