Funded Projects

The emergency department (ED) is an ideal venue to reach and intervene with adolescents and young adults (ages 16-30) at risk for opioid misuse, particularly as young adults may disconnect from primary care when transitioning out of pediatric medicine. This study will evaluate the efficacy of interventions of varying type/intensity to prevent/reduce opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). The research leverages technology that is appealing to youth to facilitate intervention delivery by health coaches. In this study, adolescents and young adults in the ED screening positive for opioid use or misuse will be randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions with outcomes measured at 4, 8, and 12 months. Technology-driven, scalable interventions delivered via health coach allow for real-time tailoring to the rapidly changing opioid epidemic, with the potential for a sustainable impact on preventing escalation of opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults.

The emergency department is an ideal venue to reach and intervene with adolescents and young adults at risk for opioid misuse, particularly as young adults may disconnect from primary care when transitioning out of care in pediatric settings. This study will evaluate the efficacy of interventions of varying type and intensity to prevent or reduce opioid misuse or opioid use disorder. The research leverages technology that is appealing to youth to facilitate intervention delivery by health coaches. In this study, adolescents and young adults in the emergency department screening positive for opioid use or misuse will be randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions with outcomes measured at 4, 8, and 12 months. Technology-driven, scalable interventions delivered via health coaches allow for real-time tailoring to the rapidly changing opioid epidemic, with the potential to prevent an increase in opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults.  Black/African American youth are at increased risk for opioid and other substance use, but they often do not participate in research studies. As a result, it is not known how well prevention interventions work with Black/African American people. This supplement will focus on increasing participant diversity and inclusion by recruiting additional Black/African American participants for this ongoing randomized controlled study of technology-driven prevention interventions.

The national public health opioid crisis has disproportionately burdened rural white populations and American Indian populations. To address this crisis, the Cherokee Nation and Emory University public health scientists will carry out an opioid prevention trial to be conducted in at-risk rural communities in the Cherokee Nation (in northeast Oklahoma) with populations of white and American Indian adolescents and young adults. The study will expand and integrate two established intervention approaches, consisting of community organizing and universal school-based brief intervention and referral to further enhance their effects in preventing and reducing opioid misuse. These interventions, called CMCA and CONNECT, were originally designed to target adolescent alcohol use, but showed significant beneficial effects on use of other drugs, including prescription drug misuse. The expanded, integrated interventions will be tested in a community-randomized trial with the goal of new systems for sustained implementation within existing structures of the Cherokee Nation.

American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) youth and young adults experience disproportionately high rates of suicide, mental health disorders, traumatic life events, and substance use disorder. More effective, culturally informed interventions are needed that are tailored to the specific needs of this population. This supplement will examine how a person?s social network contributes to their behavioral health (suicide risk, mental health, substance use) status and how this network can be leveraged to improve the uptake of prevention interventions. The long-term goal is to disseminate and translate the lessons learned into practical policy, organizational changes, and preventive innovations that optimize patient-centered health outcomes and ultimately reduce or eliminate the dramatic and tragic suicide-related health disparities among urban AI/AN YYAs.

American Native (AN) communities experience high rates of trauma that compromise the mental health of parents and caregivers that in turn increases their children?s risk for suicide and substance use during adolescence and young adulthood. Without intervention, this intergenerational cycle may repeat. The goal of this study is to understand opioid use, suicide, and the social network characteristics of Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux parents and caregivers to determine how the social network of parents/adult caregivers are related to both risk for and protection from suicide and opioid use. This supplement will examine the effectiveness of a community health worker delivered, culturally tailored prevention intervention called Wa?Kan Ye?Zah on caregiver and child behavioral and mental health outcomes and assess the benefits of culturally enhancing the intervention for caregivers? well-being.

Risk for opioid use disorder (OUD) often begins in adolescence and young adulthood. Engaging and retaining adolescents and young adults (collectively, “youth”) in early, effective treatment is critical for improving the life course trajectory of addiction. For adults with OUD, office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) with a collaborative care approach that includes behavioral therapy optimizes patient engagement and retention in care. Collaborative care OBOT is especially promising for youth, who can receive treatment from a trusted primary care provider in the same familiar setting they receive their usual medical care. To date, however, OBOT has not been formally adapted for treating youth. The central objective of this project is to develop and pilot an enhanced OBOT model for youth that is developmentally appropriate and family centered. The multidisciplinary nature of our team, which includes expertise in advanced biostatistical analysis, qualitative research, intervention development, developmental psychology, and implementation and improvement science, will maximize the chances of filling an important gap in the provision of youth specific evidence-based OUD interventions.

Evidence suggests that homeless youth have the highest rates of opioid use among youth subgroups in the country (Brands et al., 2005). Resolution of youth homelessness through housing and prevention services, often referred to as “Housing First”, has great potential to reduce the likelihood for the development of an opioid use disorder as well as other problem behaviors associated with living on the streets. However, only 20 percent to 30 percent of homeless youth samples report ever having stayed at a crisis shelter, 9 percent report having ever accessed mental health services, and 15 percent report ever having received treatment for substance use disorder (Ray, 2006), indicating a need to reach and engage youth in services that are feasible and acceptable. The results of this study will provide essential information for researchers and providers on the efficacy of housing plus opioid and related risk prevention services in a randomized controlled trial on opioid use, how moderators affect the response, and mechanisms underlying change.

Providing housing and prevention services (often referred to as “housing first”) has great potential to prevent opioid use disorder, continued homelessness, and other problem behaviors among youth experiencing homelessness. However, implementation of these services is challenging because criminal justice system involvement (which is common in this population) often prevents or delays access to housing. This project will explore interactions between criminal justice system involvement and the housing first intervention, toward reducing risks for opioid use and death among justice-involved youth experiencing homelessness

Social determinants of health are individual and environmental factors that affect health, the ability to function, and quality of life. This project will study the impact of the family-focused Families Actively Improving Relationships (FAIR) prevention intervention currently offered in rural Oregon counties to parents experiencing substance use and mental health challenges. Through the FAIR program, participants receive substance use treatment services; mental health treatment services; parent management training; and support to access employment, housing, education or to mitigate exposure to violence and discrimination. This research will examine how the FAIR intervention affects substance use and societal determinants of health, toward informing payors and decision makers about the cost and value of FAIR prevention services in rural communities.

Justice-involved young adults are one of the highest-risk populations for the development of opioid use disorder (OUD) and other significant public health problems, but they usually lack access to evidence-based practices that could potentially prevent this trajectory. The risk of unintentional death and other deleterious outcomes and long-term costs for opioid misuse for young adults, their communities and society (costs estimated at more than $115 billion annually) make this a priority, with rural areas in need of the most attention and assistance. The overriding purpose of the proposed pilot study is to prevent the onset of OUD by improving young adult offenders’ access to evidence-based risk reduction interventions, like contingency management (CM), by testing whether officers in the adult probation and parole setting can deliver such an intervention to their young adult substance using probationers who have not yet developed OUD. The primary motivation for this pilot is the clear public health need for improving and expanding delivery of substance use risk reduction interventions for young adults in the justice system. The ultimate outcome would be prevention of OUD in this high-risk population.

In 2018, new opiate prescribing limits (SB 273) were implemented across West Virginia to combat the opiate misuse epidemic. This study will utilize quantitative and qualitative measures to determine the effect of the recent opiate prescription laws in West Virginia, how a change in policy affects the opiate misuse epidemic, and how communities may apply this knowledge more broadly. The research team will: 1) collaborate with the West Virginia Board of Pharmacy to ascertain changes in opiate prescribing habits before and after the start of SB 273 using an interrupted time series methodology, and 2) achieve broad and deep understanding of how SB 273 has affected prescribing practices and experiences amongst primary care physicians, specialists (pan physicians, surgeons, emergency room physicians, etc.), and patients who currently or previously utilized opiate medications.