Funded Projects

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) has emerged as a tragic by-product of the opioid epidemic. Newborns whose mothers used opioids while pregnant can experience symptoms of opioid withdrawal in the days following birth, such as tremors, irritability, seizures, sleep, digestive, and feeding problems. However, little is known about the effect of antenatal opioid exposure on longer-term infant development over time. To address this gap in understanding, the ACT NOW Longitudinal study is examining a crucial developmental period from birth to two years of life through a comprehensive battery of assessments, including MRI imaging, neurodevelopmental behavioral assessments, and family report measures. This longitudinal cohort study is projected to include a total of 375 infants, 250 who were exposed to opioids and 125 matched controls.

Due to the opioid misuse epidemic across the nation, more infants are being exposed to narcotics during fetal life and developing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in the neonatal period. Critical gaps remain in our knowledge with respect to best practices for identifying and managing infants with NOWS and no large-scale studies have been published on treatments undertaken and later outcomes of infants with NOWS. To address these gaps in knowledge, the Advancing Clinical Trials in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (ACT NOW) study will evaluate treatment options and improve clinical care of infants with NAS/NOWS. This collaborative effort will conduct two trials: 1) Eating, Sleeping, Consoling for Neonatal Withdrawal (ESC-NOW): a Function-Based Assessment and Management Approach (ESC Study); and 2) Pragmatic, Randomized, Blinded Trial to Shorten Pharmacologic Treatment of Newborns With Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) (Weaning Study).

Very little research has been conducted on better understanding of phenotypic characterization of individuals with OUD (beyond DSM-5 diagnoses) and how these features predict illness severity, treatment retention or outcomes. The primary objective of the deep phenotyping study is to provide a comprehensive phenotypic characterization (e.g., domains of negative affect, reward salience, cognitive control, mental health) of a heterogeneous sample of individuals (n = 1,000) who currently meet one or more DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for OUD and are in treatment for OUD. In a subset of this sample (n = 100), the investigators conduct digital phenotyping to examine the utility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), digital sensing and social media to predict retention, medication adherence and opioid use outcomes in patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD. It is anticipated that this foundational study will inform the feasibility and utility of such assessments that can be successfully embedded into imminent and future CTN and other OUD clinical trials.

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

This study will (1) test pharmacologic and behavioral strategies to improve OUD pharmacotherapy treatment retention and to improve outcomes among patients who have been successfully stabilized on OUD medications and want to stop medication and (2) identify predictors of successful outcome and develop a stage model of relapse risk.

According to SAMHSA’s 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), 11.4 million persons in the U.S. report past-year opioid misuse; out of them, only 2.1 million individuals met criteria for an OUD. Very little is known about efficacious interventions for those who do not meet criteria for moderate/severe OUD (i.e., subthreshold OUD). The prevalence of subthreshold OUD in primary care settings is 5 percent to 10 percent, with higher rates (21 percent to 29 percent) among those receiving prescribed opioids. Although they are at high risk of developing moderate/severe OUD and/or dying from an overdose, little or no empirical evidence exists for pragmatic prevention interventions that can be adopted at integrated general medical settings. To study the efficacy of prevention interventions to arrest the progression from risky opioid use, researchers will test the efficacy of a STOP intervention in primary care settings. STOP adopts an early intervention approach, based on a collaborative care model to prevent progression to moderate/severe OUD, and consists of a practice-embedded nurse care manager who provides patient education and supports the primary care provider (PCP) in engaging, monitoring and guiding patients who have risky opioid use; brief advice delivered to patients by their PCP; and phone counseling of patients by behavioral health providers to motivate and support behavior change. Researchers will determine whether STOP reduces risky opioid use and examine the impact of STOP on progression to moderate/severe OUD, overdose risk behavior and overdose events in adults with risky use of illicit or prescription opioids.

For many reasons, the emergency department (ED) is a critical venue to initiate opioid use disorder (OUD) interventions. ED patients have a disproportionately high prevalence of substance use disorders and are at an elevated risk of overdose, and many do not access health care elsewhere. Despite this, OUD interventions are rarely initiated in EDs. The Emergency Department Connection to Care with Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder study (CTN-0079) will assess the feasibility, acceptability and impact of introducing clinical protocols for screening for OUD, buprenorphine treatment initiation, and referral for ongoing treatment in ED settings with high need, limited resources and different staffing structures. This extension study will use the existing infrastructure to evaluate the adoption and sustainability of the clinical protocols introduced at each of the study sites and to identify factors influencing their diffusion and effectiveness.

Despite psychopathology robustly increasing the risk for later substance use disorders (SUD), remarkably few studies have examined the impact of treating psychopathology on reducing rates of opioid use disorder (OUD), nicotine, and SUD. The main aims of this study are to implement a pragmatic set of office-based instrumentation using patient related outcome measures linked to electronic health records (EPIC) for intake and follow-up assessments to evaluate psychopathology, OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in young people aged 16-30 years old who are receiving psychopathology treatment as part of routine outpatient clinical care. The study will also examine similar age patients with non-opioid SUD in outpatient SUD treatment settings to examine the impact of treatment in mitigating the development of OUD. Data derived from this study will help inform clinical guidelines and public health policy and provide important secondary outcomes for further work on the prevention of OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in relation to early-onset psychopathology.

The growing opioid use epidemic in the U.S. has been associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of pregnant opioid-dependent women and neonatal abstinence syndrome, which is associated with adverse health effects for the infant and with costly hospitalizations. Maintenance with sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is efficacious for opioid use disorder but has disadvantages that may be heightened in pregnant women, including the potential for poor adherence, treatment dropout, and negative maternal/fetal effects associated with daily BUP peak-trough cycles. Extended release (XR) formulations may address some of these disadvantages. The primary objective of CTN-0080 is to evaluate the impact of treating opioid use disorder in pregnant women (n = 300) with BUP-XR, compared to BUP-SL, on maternal-infant outcomes. Other objectives include testing a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve maternal-infant outcomes, relative to BUP-SL; determining the economic value of BUP-XR, compared with BUP-SL, to treat OUD in pregnant women; and evaluating the impact of BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL, on neurodevelopment when the infant/child is approximately 12 and 24 months of age. Ultimately, this study will help in increasing access to treatment as well as provide quality care for pregnant/postpartum women.

The growing opioid use epidemic in the U.S. has been associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of pregnant opioid-dependent women and neonatal abstinence syndrome, which is associated with adverse health effects for the infant and with costly hospitalizations. Maintenance with sublingual (SL) buprenorphine (BUP) is efficacious for opioid use disorder but has disadvantages that may be heightened in pregnant women, including the potential for poor adherence, treatment dropout, and negative maternal/fetal effects associated with daily BUP peak-trough cycles. Extended release (XR) formulations may address some of these disadvantages. The primary objective of CTN-0080 is to evaluate the impact of treating opioid use disorder in pregnant women (n = 300) with BUP-XR, compared to BUP-SL, on maternal-infant outcomes. Other objectives include testing a conceptual model of the mechanisms by which BUP-XR may improve maternal-infant outcomes, relative to BUP-SL; determining the economic value of BUP-XR, compared with BUP-SL, to treat OUD in pregnant women; and evaluating the impact of BUP-XR, relative to BUP-SL, on neurodevelopment when the infant/child is approximately 12 and 24 months of age. Ultimately, this study will help in increasing access to treatment as well as provide quality care for pregnant/postpartum women.

The first ten years of life are accompanied by rapid changes to the developing brain and cognitive abilities. Complex interacting factors including genetics, early-life exposure to substances, family and social interactions, and home and community environments can affect brain and cognitive development. Three linked projects aim to develop effective research protocols to lay a foundation for a future HEALthy Brain and Cognitive Development (HBCD) birth cohort study. Project 1 will develop protocols for recruitment and retention of a diverse sample of pregnant and postpartum women with oversampling of mothers with prenatal opioid use. Project 2 will identify ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges for investigations in this vulnerable population and define effective solutions to enable recruitment and study of these participants. Project 3 will develop and evaluate protocols for acquiring high-quality, quantitative neuroimaging measures with magnetic resonance imaging and functional near infrared spectroscopy and assess effective strategies for measuring cognitive performance in young children, including those exposed to opioids.

Social big data analysis of publicly available user data on social media platforms is a promising approach for attaining organic observations of behavior that can monitor and predict real-world public health problems, such as HIV incidence. In preliminary research, our team identified and collected tweets suggesting HIV risk behaviors (e.g., drug use, high-risk sexual behaviors), modeled them alongside CDC statistics on HIV diagnoses, and found a significant positive relationship between HIV-related tweets and county-level HIV cases. We propose to create a single automated platform that collects social media data, identifies and labels tweets that suggest HIV-related behaviors, and predicts regional HIV incidence. We will interview staff and participants at local and regional HIV organizations to understand ethical issues associated with mining people’s data. The software developed from this application will be shared with HIV researchers and health care workers to combat the spread of HIV.