Funded Projects

Very little research has been conducted on better understanding of phenotypic characterization of individuals with OUD (beyond DSM-5 diagnoses) and how these features predict illness severity, treatment retention or outcomes. The primary objective of the deep phenotyping study is to provide a comprehensive phenotypic characterization (e.g., domains of negative affect, reward salience, cognitive control, mental health) of a heterogeneous sample of individuals (n = 1,000) who currently meet one or more DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for OUD and are in treatment for OUD. In a subset of this sample (n = 100), the investigators conduct digital phenotyping to examine the utility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA), digital sensing and social media to predict retention, medication adherence and opioid use outcomes in patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD. It is anticipated that this foundational study will inform the feasibility and utility of such assessments that can be successfully embedded into imminent and future CTN and other OUD clinical trials.

Effective treatment for OUD has been shown to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs; however, evidence of this effect in primary care settings is severely limited. The health economic findings from this study will supplement the parent PROUD trial’s results regarding clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes and provide critical contextual information for health systems and other health care stakeholders. The study will evaluate the economic viability of the PROUD collaborative care model for OUD—that is, from the perspective of the health care sector, to what extent do the downstream cost savings associated with improved patient outcomes offset the additional costs of the PROUD intervention? The specific aims are to (1) estimate the start-up and ongoing management costs of the PROUD intervention, (2) assess costs associated with health care utilization for patients who receive primary care treatment in PROUD and usual care clinics and have been identified with recognized OUDs before clinic randomization, and (3) estimate the economic value of the PROUD intervention, measured as net monetary benefit (NMB, incremental benefit minus incremental cost), from the health care sector perspective.

This study seeks to address the priority of the optimal duration of buprenorphine treatment to reduce the risk of relapse, overdose and mortality outcomes using observational data. Answering this question with a randomized trial raises ethical concerns. Observational studies with large datasets can address these important questions relatively quickly. At the same time, observational studies pose their own methodologic challenges related to confounding, misclassification of exposure and outcome, and informative loss to follow-up. This study will identify and quantify the potential for these sources of bias and then conduct analyses to address the questions of interest (risk of relapse, overdose and mortality).

The opioid crisis continues its highly negative impact, with more than 49,000 opioid-related overdose deaths in 2017. In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidelines for opioid prescribing that included opioid dosing and risk mitigation strategies, and health systems implemented similar initiatives even earlier. This has resulted in a quickly changing and more conservative prescribing environment. National data indicate the number of prescriptions has fallen between 2013 and 2016. Registries and electronic health record (EHR) data are increasingly cited as valuable resources to address critical research questions on opioid use with high efficiency. To our knowledge, no investigators have established an EHR-based prescription opioid registry across several diverse health systems with common data algorithms with the flexibility to address multiple questions. The goal of the proposed research is to develop a prescription opioid registry across 10 diverse health systems with harmonized EHR data from years 2012-2018 and leverage it to answer several key “next-step” research questions in response to the opioid crisis. The registry will include medications prescribed for treatment of OUD, including buprenorphine products.

Less than half of youth in the juvenile justice system who meet the criteria for substance use disorders (SUD) have ever received treatment, and less than one third of those received treatment while under community or correctional supervision. SUDs during adolescence can lead to significantly longer periods of substance use, more severe offending, and penetration in the justice system. The Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (TRIALS) cooperative is intended to develop and test implementation strategies and associated measures to improve the continuum of substance abuse and HIV prevention and treatment services delivered to youth under juvenile justice supervision.

People who use opioids in rural areas suffer worse health and less insurance coverage. The opioid problem in rural areas is of particular concern, as rural areas have higher overdose rates despite equivalent rates of OUD. This is because rural areas have a scant number of clinics and clinicians who provide medication treatment for OUD. Thus, people living in rural areas must travel long distances to access clinics that may or may not have expertise in providing treatment to patients with OUD. Telemedicine (TM) could efficiently increase capacity for delivery of buprenorphine in rural areas and may increase the number of patients receiving medication treatment and improve treatment retention and outcomes. While the development of medication treatments for opioid use disorder (MOUD) capacity in primary care settings with optimal/comprehensive services is desirable, the current opioid crisis with escalating overdose death rates in rural areas suggests a need to implement an efficient, cost-effective system of MOUD services that can be scaled up quickly. The use of a centralized and Medicare-covered TM vendor utilizing a developed methodology and established organizational infrastructure offers the great potential for a rapid rollout to increase access to MOUD and improve treatment retention in rural areas. This cluster randomized clinical trial with two phases will test expanded treatment access to improve retention on MOUD in highly affected rural areas. Phase I will include implementing telemedicine in a limited number of rural sites with varying levels of office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) to inform implementation strategies for the main trial, and Phase II will include evaluate comparative effectiveness between OBOT alone and OBOT + TM at 30 sites.

The U.S. is in the midst of a devastating opioid epidemic. Since 1999, the number of overdose (OD) deaths involving opioids has quadrupled. These trends are magnified among American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) compared to other racial/ethnic groups. AI/ANs are second only to Whites in the rate of OD mortality (8/100,000 versus 12/100,000 deaths, respectively). Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD; i.e., methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone) are considered the most effective treatment, reducing mortality and increasing abstinence and retention. However, numerous barriers limit the uptake of medications for OUD in tribal communities and within urban treatment settings serving AI/AN individuals. This is a two-phase formative research study to develop and test an implementation intervention for programs to provide medications to treat OUD specifically with AI/AN consumers. The objective of Phase I (12 months) is to develop a culturally centered implementation intervention to integrate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) into health care/addiction specialty settings. The objective of Phase II (24 months) is to conduct a preliminary test of the implementation intervention at four sites serving AI/AN communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods will be used throughout both phases. This study will help with decreasing stigma and increase the utilization of MOUD in health care settings that serve AI/AN populations.

This project seeks to develop and test a “train-the-trainer” curriculum and training experience that will facilitate the spread and use of the 6BBs by adapting the 6BBs framework and toolkit for health systems and other organizations, training personnel to facilitate its implementation and monitoring results of this implementation.

Overcoming barriers to substance use (SU) screening and enrollment in SU care is central to decreasing justice-involved youth’s (JIY) negative HIV-related outcomes. This project proposes to embed HIV testing outreach workers from a youth-focused medical and HIV treatment program into an alternative sentencing program (ASP) to deliver a new service delivery model (Link2CARE) that integrates evidenced-based protocols for JIY to promote HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing and HIV and SU risk screening, and provide on-site intervention and cross-system linkage to HIV, STI, and SU care. We propose to determine the efficacy of Link2CARE delivered by health staff embedded within the ASP on HIV, STI, and SU outcomes; to determine the influence of theoretically based intervention mechanisms of change on the proposed HIV and SU outcomes; and to describe Link2CARE implementation and elucidate the system/organizational-, staff-, and youth-level factors that influence implementation of Link2CARE in an ASP.

Justice-involved veterans have lower access to opioid use disorder (OUD) pharmacotherapy and need an effective transition from the justice system to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and community health care systems to improve drug addiction treatment and outcomes. We will quantitatively evaluate patient and facility characteristics associated with differences in receipt of OUD pharmacotherapy among justice-involved veterans compared with non-justice-involved veterans and within-facility changes over time; qualitatively identify drivers of higher or lower access to OUD pharmacotherapy among justice-involved veterans compared with other veterans with OUD at the same facility; evaluate stakeholders’ perceptions of factors that explain within-facility changes in access to OUD pharmacotherapy over time; and develop and conduct a formative evaluation of implementation strategies to improve access to OUD pharmacotherapy. Results will be used to design and select implementation strategies that address identified barriers to improve access to OUD pharmacotherapy for justice-involved veterans.

A major driver of the U.S. opioid crisis is limited access to effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) that reduce the risk of overdose. Traditionally, jails and prisons in the U.S. do not initiate or maintain MOUD for inmates with OUD prior to their return to the community, which places them at high risk for fatal overdose. The Massachusetts Justice Community Opioid Innovation Network (JCOIN) will study the outcomes and implementation of a 2018 state law that seven county jails must provide all approved forms of medication for OUD. The Chapter 208 initiative has important implications for future policy and practice in the justice and OUD treatment systems at the local, state, and national levels.

A large number of probationers/parolees with opioid use disorder have limited access to effective treatment. This study is the first random clinical trial in the United States that will assess the effectiveness of buprenorphine treatment using MedicaSafe, a system composed of secure pre-packaged buprenorphine/naloxone cartridges, designed to be dispensed by a SmartKey device that enables clinicians to track patient adherence. The study will initiate treatment at a community corrections office compared to referral to a community program. The public health impact of the proposed study would be widespread, as this model of care could be implemented throughout many areas of the United States with high rates of opioid use disorder in their probation/parolee populations that lack access to methadone treatment.