Funded Projects

High rates of relapse and overdose deaths pose significant challenges to the treatment of Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). Anti-opioid immunotherapies (i.e., vaccines and monoclonal antibodies) have great potential to reduce long-term opioid use and overdose, with minimal risk of side effects, when used in conjunction with pharmacological treatments and/or behavioral therapies. The ability of an anti-opioid vaccine to induce antibodies that render an opioid less effective, or less rewarding, and protect from accidental overdose could provide an important therapeutic option for patients undergoing treatment for OUD. The goal of this collaborative study is to design, develop, and evaluate vaccines for use in the treatment of opioid use disorder

Most people with opioid use disorder are either not in treatment or receive inconsistent treatment. Peer support is proven to be effective at engaging patients who are unwilling or unable to seek traditional treatment, but commonly available group support models are often separate from other clinical care or are otherwise hard for patients to access. This research will test a novel, machine learning enabled, digital peer support program added to an anonymous text-based social network that can provide 24/7 support for patients at all stages of recovery. The project will examine the ability of this digital service to engage and retain patients with opioid use disorder and will also develop novel techniques to automatically analyze patient messages for clinical and social determinants of health-related needs.

Social determinants of health are individual and environmental factors that affect health, the ability to function, and quality of life. This project will study the impact of the family-focused Families Actively Improving Relationships (FAIR) prevention intervention currently offered in rural Oregon counties to parents experiencing substance use and mental health challenges. Through the FAIR program, participants receive substance use treatment services; mental health treatment services; parent management training; and support to access employment, housing, education or to mitigate exposure to violence and discrimination. This research will examine how the FAIR intervention affects substance use and societal determinants of health, toward informing payors and decision makers about the cost and value of FAIR prevention services in rural communities.

Despite psychopathology robustly increasing the risk for later substance use disorders (SUD), remarkably few studies have examined the impact of treating psychopathology on reducing rates of opioid use disorder (OUD), nicotine, and SUD. The main aims of this study are to implement a pragmatic set of office-based instrumentation using patient related outcome measures linked to electronic health records (EPIC) for intake and follow-up assessments to evaluate psychopathology, OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in young people aged 16-30 years old who are receiving psychopathology treatment as part of routine outpatient clinical care. The study will also examine similar age patients with non-opioid SUD in outpatient SUD treatment settings to examine the impact of treatment in mitigating the development of OUD. Data derived from this study will help inform clinical guidelines and public health policy and provide important secondary outcomes for further work on the prevention of OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in relation to early-onset psychopathology.

This study will examine the epidemiology of injection drug use, its infectious consequences, and service accessibility among young persons who inject drugs (PWID) in 15 rural counties in Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont, then implement an integrated telemedicine approach to treat opioid use disorder (OUD) and reduce infections and overdose. The UG3 phase will characterize the risk environment and epidemiology of OUD, its infectious complications, opioid overdose, risk behaviors, service use, and needs in young PWID in these counties. An environmental assessment of policy and infrastructure will examine available services, needs, and gaps. The UH3 phase will evaluate the effectiveness of a regionalized integrated model of expanded service delivery for rural PWID. This project will provide in-depth understanding of high-risk rural PWID, inform community response strategies, and implement a comprehensive, integrated approach to treat OUD and reduce overdose and infectious complications among PWID in the rural United States.

Due to the opioid misuse epidemic across the nation, more infants are being exposed to narcotics during fetal life and developing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) in the neonatal period. Critical gaps remain in our knowledge with respect to best practices for identifying and managing infants with NOWS and no large-scale studies have been published on treatments undertaken and later outcomes of infants with NOWS. To address these gaps in knowledge, the Advancing Clinical Trials in Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (ACT NOW) study will evaluate treatment options and improve clinical care of infants with NAS/NOWS. This collaborative effort will conduct two trials: 1) Eating, Sleeping, Consoling for Neonatal Withdrawal (ESC-NOW): a Function-Based Assessment and Management Approach (ESC Study); and 2) Pragmatic, Randomized, Blinded Trial to Shorten Pharmacologic Treatment of Newborns With Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome (NOWS) (Weaning Study).

Office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) with buprenorphine/naloxone prevents overdose deaths. Nonpharmacologic approaches to anxiety, stress, and emotion dysregulation are needed during primary care OBOT, which is the primary access point for opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment in most U.S. counties. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBI) safely and reliably reduce the impact of stress, anxiety, depression, and chronic pain, which could increase OBOT retention while reducing rates of relapse and overdose deaths. Current 8-week standard MBIs do not appear to have strong, sustained impact on substance use outcomes, suggesting longer or enhanced MBIs are needed in the OUD treatment setting. This project proposes to adapt, refine, and compare the effectiveness of the 6-month Mindful Recovery OUD Care Continuum delivered within group-based opioid treatment (GBOT) versus standard GBOT alone.

Chronic pain and opioid use disorders (OUD) are burgeoning interrelated epidemics. Sleep disturbances are prevalent, treatable, and increasingly recognized as risk factors for both chronic pain and OUD. Sleep disruption impairs endogenous pain inhibition, linked to analgesic efficacy and rewarding properties of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists. It is not known, however, whether sleep disturbance causally alters mechanisms that contribute to OUD risk. Sleep continuity disruption (SCD) and/or sleep fragmentation (SF) may alter cerebral MOR availability, and these forms of sleep disruption may increase OUD risk. This study aims to 1) evaluate whether experimental SCD and/or SF alter resting or pain-evoked MOR binding potential (BP) in brain regions associated with pain inhibition; 2) examine whether SCD and/or SF alters the analgesic response; and 3) determine whether MOR BP in brain regions of interest are associated with analgesia and abuse liability.

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of 4-7.

Safe and stable housing is widely considered to be critical to recovery from alcohol and drug use disorders. Therefore, providing dedicated safe and substance-free housing options for individuals in recovery (recovery housing) may be an essential component of a comprehensive response to the current opioid crisis. However, there is limited evidence about effective recovery housing practices for individuals choosing treatment with medications for opioid use disorders as part of their path to recovery. This project will enhance the infrastructure necessary to study the effectiveness of recovery housing for these individuals. It will develop a national multi-stakeholder network, host webinars for researchers and recovery housing providers, and support mentored pilot studies for new researchers seeking to study recovery housing.