Funded Projects

There is a great deal of research aimed at better understanding transitions in alcohol and other drug (AOD) use patterns from early to late adolescence and from late adolescence to emerging adulthood. However, no studies to date have (a) assessments of AOD use from ages 10 to 24 across all developmental periods (middle school, high school, and emerging adulthood); (b) a large sample with substantial racial and ethnic diversity, particularly among Hispanic and Asian youth; (c) in-depth coverage of 10 areas of functioning across three key domains; (d) subjective and objective neighborhood data; or (e) the capacity to examine developmental trajectories for more than one substance. The current proposal is a continuation of previous projects that assessed AOD use across nine waves of data from age 10 to age 19. The proposed study capitalizes on the longitudinal data on protective and risk factors we have collected since age 10 in an ethnically diverse cohort by continuing to annually assess these youth in order to capture important transitions to emerging adulthood (through age 24). By advancing the epidemiology of alcohol use during adolescence and emerging adulthood, our findings can affect prevention and intervention programming for young people and address critical issues of public health policy.

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a problem affecting millions of Americans. Psychosocial approaches are efficacious for addressing the multidimensional nature of CLBP. Three of the most widely implemented nonpharmacological techniques for CLBP management are cognitive therapy (CT), mindfulness meditation (MM), and behavioral activation (BA). However, there is a critical lack of research examining if these techniques work via the mechanisms specified by theory. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and ActiGraph technology embedded within a randomized controlled trial, consisting of daily measures of process and outcome, is ideal for testing mechanism models both during treatment and during the critical period following treatment. The current proposal seeks to utilize EMA and ActiGraph to examine if changes in cognitive content, cognitive process, and activity level are mechanisms specific to CT, MM, and BA, respectively, for reducing pain interference. Elucidating the mechanisms of pain coping skills will lead to streamlined CLBP interventions.

Justice-involved young adults are one of the highest-risk populations for the development of opioid use disorder (OUD) and other significant public health problems, but they usually lack access to evidence-based practices that could potentially prevent this trajectory. The risk of unintentional death and other deleterious outcomes and long-term costs for opioid misuse for young adults, their communities and society (costs estimated at more than $115 billion annually) make this a priority, with rural areas in need of the most attention and assistance. The overriding purpose of the proposed pilot study is to prevent the onset of OUD by improving young adult offenders’ access to evidence-based risk reduction interventions, like contingency management (CM), by testing whether officers in the adult probation and parole setting can deliver such an intervention to their young adult substance using probationers who have not yet developed OUD. The primary motivation for this pilot is the clear public health need for improving and expanding delivery of substance use risk reduction interventions for young adults in the justice system. The ultimate outcome would be prevention of OUD in this high-risk population.

Morbidity and mortality related to prescription opioids are accelerating in the United States. Identifying the factors that lead to new opioid dependence among opioid naïve patients is a critical opportunity to reduce prescription opioid dependence and unintended diversion. In the United States, the majority of individuals who become opioid dependent receive their first opioid prescription following surgical procedures, yet there are no clinical guidelines to inform appropriate postoperative opioid use. We will examine the patient factors that are associated with postoperative pain and opioid consumption among a cohort of patients undergoing common elective abdominal procedures. We will identify the provider characteristics in postoperative opioid prescribing practices, and design and implement a provider-directed intervention to optimize postoperative opioid prescribing. Findings will inform patients and providers regarding the risk of opioid dependence following surgery, and will establish a patient-centered data infrastructure that yields continuous feedback to providers regarding appropriate opioid prescribing practices.

The Family School Partnership (FSP) and classroom-centered (CC) interventions targeted aggressive-coercive behavior and poor academic achievement as antecedents of the distal outcomes of antisocial behavior, substance abuse/dependence, psychiatric symptoms/disorders, high-risk sexual behavior and successful adaptation to the relevant developmental demands of the educational, work, romantic relationships and family (both family of procreation and origin/orientation) social fields/contexts. The participants of the FSP and CC original prevention trial were a population (n = 798) of urban, predominately African-American young adults, who began first grade in the fall of 1993 in nine elementary schools in predominantly low- to lower-middle-income Baltimore areas. The central purpose of the proposed study is to extend through ages 31-35 an examination of normal and pathogenic development and the impact of these two universal first-grade preventive interventions on the distal targets mentioned above. We will continue to study the role of phenotypic and genetic factors (and their interactions) as well as the impact of the interventions on the development and course of substance use/abuse/dependence, psychiatric symptoms/disorders, antisocial behavior/disorder and high-risk sexual behavior through young adulthood. The knowledge accrued over the course of the proposed assessments should serve to inform the nature, targets and timing of our future preventive intervention efforts.

This proposal aims to test the impact of an empirically derived implementation strategy—under real-world conditions and across multiple child service systems—on successful adoption and sustainment of two evidence-based programs that address adolescent substance abuse: Treatment Foster Care Oregon (TFCO; formerly Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care) and Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT). The overarching goal of this proposal is to evaluate whether the integration of implementation fidelity (fidelity to the implementation process) with intervention fidelity (fidelity to the clinical intervention) can increase the probability that a new organizational site not only successfully adopts a program but develops the infrastructure to ensure it can sustain. This study will (a) evaluate the effect of stages of implementation completion coaching strategy (SIC-CS) on outcomes of program adoption and sustainment, (b) extend the SIC to include measurement of sustainment, and (c) examine cost and resource patterns most likely to yield sustainable programs.

Four out of five youth in the juvenile justice (JJ) system show evidence of being under the influence during their offenses, and more than half test positive for substances at the time of their arrest. Preventive intervention approaches that can be easily implemented within JJ settings may offer greater access to substance use care as well as increase families’ motivation to comply with court referrals to seek further services. It is especially important to evaluate interventions for court-involved, non-incarcerated (CINI) juveniles, as these youth account for two-thirds of those arrested; however, the bulk of extant research has been conducted with detained or incarcerated youth. In this application for supplemental funding, we capitalize on our parent grant (Brief Individual and Parent Interventions for Marijuana Misuse in Truant Adolescents) by proposing to develop an adjunctive, targeted preventive intervention for marijuana-using, JJ youth who are at elevated risk for illicit opioid use. The goal will be to develop a protocol for a single-session, parent-adolescent preventive intervention to decrease the likelihood of illicit opioid use in CINI adolescents. This formative work will culminate in a draft intervention manual.

The System of Safety (SOS) represents an opportunity to study the implementation of best practice suicide-related care processes that embody the Zero Suicide Essential Elements of Care across emergency departments, inpatient medical and behavioral health units, and primary care clinics associated with a large healthcare system. This effectiveness trial will use a stepped wedge design across a total of 39 clinical units. Aim 1 will measure suicide risk screening and screening's impact on risk identification. Aim 2 will measure the effective implementation of clinician-administered interventions, such as safety planning with means restriction counseling, on suicide, suicide attempts, and suicide-related acute healthcare. Exploratory aims will examine mechanisms of action, moderators, economics, and population effects of the intervention. This study's innovative approach positions it for a significant impact on the fields of suicide prevention, CQI, and effectiveness trial design and analysis.

The project will address gaps in both risk identification and clinical management by utilizing comprehensive clinical data from a mature health information exchange containing more than 2.3 million patients across the spectrum of clinical care (hospitals, primary care, specialty care, community health centers, urgent care) to develop a statistically robust method to measure suicide risk associated with prescription opioid use. First, the team will couple data fusion techniques with machine learning-based approaches in identifying the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with elevated risk of suicidal behavior among prescription opioid users. Second, the team will develop clinical profiles of patients with higher risk of suicidal behavior associated with prescription opioids, and to incorporate these profiles in a clinical decision support platform that can be used for identification and intervention at the point of care. The clinical decision support tool developed under this proposal will provide a generalizable platform that could be extended to other more conventional opioid related outcomes such as OUD and overdose.

Paralleling overall population trends, opioid use has escalated among pregnant and postpartum women, particularly among those with co-occurring perinatal mood and anxiety disorders, yet treatment remains underutilized. Since 2008, health insurance coverage changes led to a dramatic expansion of behavioral health coverage by increasing coverage and extending federal parity protections to more than 60 million Americans. Characterizing the clinical and economic impacts of these unprecedented extensions of behavioral coverage on maternal and infant outcomes among women with perinatal opioid use, chronic pain, and suicidality with and without co-occurring perinatal mood and anxiety disorders will inform future policy and targeted interventions

Substance use disorders (SUDs) can have devastating consequences for people with serious mental illness (SMI). SUDs can increase morbidity and mortality and are associated with higher healthcare and social costs, homelessness, and incarceration. Unfortunately, despite the availability of effective treatments, most individuals with co-occurring SMI and SUD (COD) never receive SUD treatment. We propose to evaluate system, provider, and patient-level facilitators and barriers and develop an implementation strategy and toolkit to promote the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for people with COD. Aims 1–3 seek to assess organizational capacity (at the system and provider level); organizational readiness (at the provider level); and perceived needs, attitudes, and preferences (at the patient level) to identify barriers and facilitators. In Aim 4, we will use findings from Aims 1–3 to guide development of the implementation strategy and toolkit, using stakeholder input and a systematic process for strategy development.