Funded Projects

Chronic pancreatitis is a painful condition often caused by long-term alcohol use, and patients often require treatment with strong pain medications, including opioids. Therefore, alternative treatments for chronic pancreatitis are needed. This project will use machine learning approaches to create a prediction tool based on electroencephalography analyses, sensory tests, and psychological questionnaires that can help determine which patients with chronic pancreatitis will benefit most from a specific type of treatment called endoscopic therapy.

This project aims to develop a novel abuse deterrent formulation (ADF) that will be uniquely designed to prevent abuse of the prescription pill. The study will focus on the development of the ADF with design aspects specifically focused on abuse through insufflation, smoking, injection, and taking multiple pills. The study will also validate the design by putting the pill through a rigorous test following the procedures outlined by the FDA Abuse-Deterrent-Opioids-Evaluation and Labeling guidelines. The study could result in the development of a novel ADF that will be resistant to a wide range of tampering, resulting in a safer formulation and pill design.

Juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth represent a particularly vulnerable population for substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs), because they often experience mental health disorders, dysfunctional family/social relationships, and complex trauma. This study will adapt and test an intervention for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older JJ-involved youth aging out of JJ (16-18 years), who are transitioning to their communities after a period of detainment in a secure treatment or correctional facility. Trust-Based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®, a relational, attachment-based intervention that promotes emotional regulation through interaction with responsive adults) will be adapted as a prevention intervention targeting youth at risk for substance use, especially non-medical use of opioids. Safe adults (e.g., parent/guardian) will be trained in behavior management techniques for empowering youth to appropriately express their needs, connecting them with others in pro-social ways, and correcting or reshaping undesirable behavior.

Non-punishment, support-based preventive interventions in schools are needed to reduce misuse of opioids and other substances among youth. This project will test an intervention to improve school climate by introducing a learning approach that encourages behavior that is supportive and respectful in middle schools. ISLA reduces the use of exclusionary and discipline practices, such as suspensions and expulsions, that can be racially discriminating. The research aims to improve inclusive teaching practices, student engagement, student-teacher relationships, and school climate, while reducing student misuse of opioids and other substances.

Quality implementation of evidence-based programs (EBPs) in community settings for youth is critical for reducing the burden of alcohol, tobacco and other drug (ATOD) use and its consequences. EBPs delivered in schools are an efficient way to reach large populations of young people, including those underserved by other settings, and reduce and prevent ATOD use. Yet youth rarely receive EBPs as intended in community settings, including schools. This training and research plan will prepare the investigator to become an independent scholar in the implementation of theories and frameworks to better understand factors related to program delivery—approaches to enhancing ATOD programs for youth in community settings. More specifically, the training will allow him to expand the application of Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to inform approaches to enhancing effective EBP delivery. The proposed training and research plan extends current implementation research to focus applying implementation theories, frameworks and strategies in other community settings (schools) and on economic evaluation of implementation strategies. The results are expected to improve current efforts to deliver EBPs in diverse community settings and aid in applying evidence-based implementation strategies in the school context to ultimately reduce and prevent ATOD use among youth.

While the mu opioid receptor (MOR) antagonist naloxone has proven invaluable as an opioid overdose antidote, naloxone suffers from a very short duration of action (half-life is approximately 1 hour) and has been found to be less effective against newer, long-acting opioids, including fentanyl (half-life is approximately 7–10 hours). This leads to a highly lethal and increasingly prevalent phenomenon known as “renarcotization,” wherein an overdose patient revived with naloxone can re-enter an overdose state from residual fentanyl in the body. Thus, there is a critical need to develop a long-acting MOR antagonist formulation that can address renarcotization by providing multi-hour protection. The goal of this project is to reformulate naloxone using FDA-approved microencapsulation technology into a long-acting injectable (LAI) that can provide 12–24 hours of sustained antagonist activity in vivo. It will employ a proprietary Computational Drug Delivery™ software, called ADSR™, to perform in silico formulation optimization as well as to predict its in vitro dissolution and in vivo pharmacokinetic behavior.

Effective treatment for OUD has been shown to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs; however, evidence of this effect in primary care settings is severely limited. The health economic findings from this study will supplement the parent PROUD trial’s results regarding clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes and provide critical contextual information for health systems and other health care stakeholders. The study will evaluate the economic viability of the PROUD collaborative care model for OUD—that is, from the perspective of the health care sector, to what extent do the downstream cost savings associated with improved patient outcomes offset the additional costs of the PROUD intervention? The specific aims are to (1) estimate the start-up and ongoing management costs of the PROUD intervention, (2) assess costs associated with health care utilization for patients who receive primary care treatment in PROUD and usual care clinics and have been identified with recognized OUDs before clinic randomization, and (3) estimate the economic value of the PROUD intervention, measured as net monetary benefit (NMB, incremental benefit minus incremental cost), from the health care sector perspective.

Effective treatment for OUD has been shown to improve patient outcomes and reduce health care costs; however, evidence of this effect in primary care settings is severely limited. The health economic findings from this study will supplement the parent PROUD trial’s results regarding clinical effectiveness and implementation outcomes and provide critical contextual information for health systems and other health care stakeholders. The study will evaluate the economic viability of the PROUD collaborative care model for OUD—that is, from the perspective of the health care sector, to what extent do the downstream cost savings associated with improved patient outcomes offset the additional costs of the PROUD intervention? The specific aims are to (1) estimate the start-up and ongoing management costs of the PROUD intervention, (2) assess costs associated with health care utilization for patients who receive primary care treatment in PROUD and usual care clinics and have been identified with recognized OUDs before clinic randomization, and (3) estimate the economic value of the PROUD intervention, measured as net monetary benefit (NMB, incremental benefit minus incremental cost), from the health care sector perspective.

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a significant public health problem in the United States. Particularly troubling is the rapid evolution of an opioid epidemic within the past decade, characterized by a surge in unintentional overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids, such as fentanyl. The current standard of care for opioid overdose is reversal with opioid antagonist naloxone. Naloxone is effective at reversing overdose from prescription opioids and heroin, but less effective when combating fentanyl, due to fentanyl?s high potency. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against fentanyl could overcome this problem by specifically preventing the drug from entering the central nervous system, averting overdose and attenuating opioid-induced respiratory depression. This study will develop and design of laboratory protocols needed to establish a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) process, quality assurance protocol, and stability profile for a new human mAb against fentanyl. Subsequent production of current GMP material will enable Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) toxicology studies in rats and dogs and eventually a Phase I/IIa clinical trial. This material will also be used in final opioid-induced respiratory depression studies in mice and non-human primates to confirm therapeutic efficacy of final drug product. If successful, these activities will enable filing for an investigational new drug application for this mAb candidate with the FDA.

Multidisciplinary chronic pain treatments show incomplete recovery at the population level because of significant heterogeneity on the individual level in the high impact chronic pain population. Subgroups of individuals either completely respond, do not change, or even worsen following pain management. Therefore, diagnostic biomarker signatures are needed to differentiate high impact chronic pain from low impact chronic pain. This study aims to develop prognostic biomarkers to predict the disease trajectory for individuals with musculoskeletal high-impact chronic pain. These biomarker signatures will integrate central nervous system (CNS), multi-?omic?, sensory, functional, psychosocial, and demographic domains into detection algorithms. Biomarker signatures from the proposed research are intended to facilitate risk and treatment stratification for clinical trial design and to facilitate treatment decisions in clinical practice for patients with musculoskeletal chronic pain.

Enhancing the workforce of pain investigators and practitioners is a key goal of the NIH HEAL Initiative. This mentoring award leverages the resources at one of EPPIC-Net’s Specialized Clinical Centers to encourage interest in clinical pain management, in particular through multidisciplinary pain research projects. A selected investigator will train early career clinical researchers on how to develop and validate relevant pain measures and outcomes in chronic pain conditions, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and neuropathic chronic low back pain. Mentoring activities will include formal research and analysis, active inclusion in EPPIC-Net working groups, and collaborative writing experiences.

Women with opioid use disorder (OUD) are disproportionately impacted by physical, sexual, and psychological intimate partner violence and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Yet, treatment approaches that address all these conditions together in OUD treatment settings are lacking. To address this gap, this project will evaluate delivery of two evidence-based interventions to address PTSD (Present-Centered Therapy+ and Helping to Overcome PTSD through Empowerment) for women seeking OUD treatment who have experienced intimate partner violence. It will also determine if integrated treatment can help retain the women in medication treatment for OUD.

Data suggest that members of minority groups are more likely to develop chronic pain and to have greater pain burden. We will identify a set of promising intervention targets for reducing or eliminating racial/ethnic pain disparities. We will interview adult survivors of serious physical injury, comprised of roughly equal proportions of African-Americans (AA), Latinos, and non-Latino Whites (NLW), and examine their medical records for information on injury severity and medication use in-hospital. Our aims are to determine whether: 1) AA and Latino physical injury survivors experience more severe pain relative to NLW; 2) AA and Latino injury survivors experience greater pain burden relative to NLW counterparts; 3) differences in pain severity burden are linked to a set of target candidates for interventions; and (4) pain outcomes in at-risk minority groups can be linked to a set of target candidates for group-tailored interventions to reduce pain severity and pain burden.