Funded Projects

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

There is a significant treatment gap between patients diagnosed with OUD and those who seek treatment, and only a small proportion of those seeking treatment receive MOUD. Primary care is the most common point of health care contact in the U.S. and is an important venue to address stigma, improve access to treatment and improve quality of care. Over the past decade, electronic health record (EHR)-linked Web-based point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) systems designed to improve quality of chronic disease care have become increasingly sophisticated and successful. A Web-based and EHR-integrated OUD CDS system to offer expert guidance to primary care providers (PCPs) on the diagnosis and management of OUD was developed and piloted. This project will implement the OUD clinical decision support system in three large diverse health care systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or usual care (UC). The project will evaluate the impact of OUD CDS on practice process measures and patient outcomes. The study will also prepare for scalability and dissemination by evaluating facilitators and barriers to implementation, determining the costs of implementation and maintenance and assessing the short-term cost impacts of the OUD-CDS.

While advances in cancer treatment have increased survival rates, these patients often suffer from chronic cancer pain. Prescription opioids are often prescribed during active cancer treatment, but their long-term use for chronic cancer pain is associated with risk for opioid use disorder and risk for stigmatization associated with emotional distress, suboptimal health behaviors and coping strategies, and difficult patient-provider communication. This study aims to conduct qualitative interviews exploring prescription opioid and chronic pain stigma in cancer survivors with moderate-to-severe pain, caregivers, and clinicians who treat patients with chronic cancer pain, including oncologists, primary care providers, pain management specialists, and palliative care physicians. An analysis of potential contributors to stigma in cancer survivors will be completed to support development of multi-level behavioral interventions to reduce stigma and explore long-term health outcomes from such interventions.

There is a significant treatment gap between patients diagnosed with OUD and those who seek treatment, and only a small proportion of those seeking treatment receive MOUD. Primary care is the most common point of health care contact in the U.S. and is an important venue to address stigma, improve access to treatment and improve quality of care. Over the past decade, electronic health record (EHR)-linked Web-based point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) systems designed to improve quality of chronic disease care have become increasingly sophisticated and successful. A Web-based and EHR-integrated OUD CDS system to offer expert guidance to primary care providers (PCPs) on the diagnosis and management of OUD was developed and piloted. This project will implement the OUD clinical decision support system in three large diverse health care systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or usual care (UC). The project will evaluate the impact of OUD CDS on practice process measures and patient outcomes. The study will also prepare for scalability and dissemination by evaluating facilitators and barriers to implementation, determining the costs of implementation and maintenance and assessing the short-term cost impacts of the OUD-CDS.

There is a significant treatment gap between patients diagnosed with OUD and those who seek treatment, and only a small proportion of those seeking treatment receive MOUD. Primary care is the most common point of health care contact in the U.S. and is an important venue to address stigma, improve access to treatment and improve quality of care. Over the past decade, electronic health record (EHR)-linked Web-based point-of-care clinical decision support (CDS) systems designed to improve quality of chronic disease care have become increasingly sophisticated and successful. A Web-based and EHR-integrated OUD CDS system to offer expert guidance to primary care providers (PCPs) on the diagnosis and management of OUD was developed and piloted. This project will implement the OUD clinical decision support system in three large diverse health care systems and randomize a minimum of 30 clinics to receive the OUD-CDS intervention or usual care (UC). The project will evaluate the impact of OUD CDS on practice process measures and patient outcomes. The study will also prepare for scalability and dissemination by evaluating facilitators and barriers to implementation, determining the costs of implementation and maintenance and assessing the short-term cost impacts of the OUD-CDS.

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

The U.S. is in the midst of a devastating opioid epidemic. Since 1999, the number of overdose (OD) deaths involving opioids has quadrupled. These trends are magnified among American Indians/Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) compared to other racial/ethnic groups. AI/ANs are second only to Whites in the rate of OD mortality (8/100,000 versus 12/100,000 deaths, respectively). Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD; i.e., methadone, buprenorphine and naltrexone) are considered the most effective treatment, reducing mortality and increasing abstinence and retention. However, numerous barriers limit the uptake of medications for OUD in tribal communities and within urban treatment settings serving AI/AN individuals. This is a two-phase formative research study to develop and test an implementation intervention for programs to provide medications to treat OUD specifically with AI/AN consumers. The objective of Phase I (12 months) is to develop a culturally centered implementation intervention to integrate medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) into health care/addiction specialty settings. The objective of Phase II (24 months) is to conduct a preliminary test of the implementation intervention at four sites serving AI/AN communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) methods will be used throughout both phases. This study will help with decreasing stigma and increase the utilization of MOUD in health care settings that serve AI/AN populations.

Emergency department (ED)-initiated buprenorphine/naloxone (BUP) with referral for ongoing BUP is superior to referral alone in engaging patients with untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) in treatment at 30 days and is cost-effective. However, logistical barriers exist in translating research into practice. New BUP formulations such as the extended-release injectable BUP (CAM2038, XR-BUP) hold promise in addressing many of the barriers more effectively than sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) by treating the patients’ symptoms for up to seven days. This study will recruit, train and provide resources to 30 ED sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to address stigma and provide ED-initiated BUP for patients presenting with OUD who are not receiving medications for OUD. Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of SL-BUP versus XR-BUP on ED patients’ engagement in formal addiction treatment seven days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the use of XR-BUP will be assessed in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores of

Medications have proven to be effective for treating opioid use disorder (OUD). Increasing accessibility to buprenorphine provides an opportunity for many with OUD to benefit from its proven effectiveness. Adherence to medication-based treatments however is low, in part because of the stigma associated with use of this and other effective drugs and as such, leads to inadequate treatment and poor outcomes. This study aims to understand the effects of stigma on patient engagement, retention, and outcomes of buprenorphine treatment. Knowledge drawn from the HIV Stigma Theory and tools developed to reduce HIV associated stigma will be used to assess OUD stigma and to develop interventions to reduce it in the context of buprenorphine treatment. The study findings may provide resources to address stigma and thus maximize treatment adherence among those affected by OUD.

Among the more than half-million adults entering addiction treatment for prescription opioid abuse every year, 50%-60% report co-morbid chronic pain, and 80% report that pain triggers relapse. Individualized/self-stigma among adults with substance abuse has been shown to lead to delayed recovery, increased relapse and reduced treatment-related attendance. Stigma may induce significant burden on patients with OUD and chronic pain and there may be unique characteristics of stigma for this population due to the overlap between medical treatment and substance abuse. Multiple sources of stigma may be imposed including internalized/self-stigma as well as intragroup/peer-to-peer (?horizontal?) stigma whereby peers impose stigma upon each other based on the type and severity of past drug use. Furthermore, stigma could be ?vertical? in that stigma may be enacted by health care providers or by treatment center staff. However, there is notably a lack of research and related assessment tools to measure these multidimensional facets of stigma, particularly in patients with OUD and chronic pain. The investigators will utilize a mixed-methods approach to evaluate internalized/self-stigma, anticipated/expected stigma and enacted stigma using existing standardized surveys, and to describe horizontal and vertical stigma in individuals with OUD and pain at multiple sites. In addition, the investigators will integrate the quantitative and qualitative information to help inform modifications to the psychotherapy component (I-STOP) of the parent award intervention, which would then also target multidimensional stigma in patients with OUD and chronic pain.

Stigma is a key barrier to retention in medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder, particularly among low-income, minority individuals. Stigma that exists at multiple levels contributes to poor retention in care, including internalized and anticipated stigma at the individual level, as well as enacted stigma at the health care provider- and community levels. There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate innovative strategies to reduce stigma at these multiple levels among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve engagement in care. One of the most promising strategies to reduce multiple intersecting stigmas simultaneously and improve engagement in care for low-income, minority individuals is through the use of peer recovery coaches (PRCs). PRCs, individuals who have gone through the recovery process themselves and are typically state-certified, have been shown to be more acceptable for engaging and retaining low-income, racial/ethnic minority patients in treatment compared to other health workers. However, scarce research has formally evaluated the effects of PRCs on stigma. This study will test how a PRC model can reduce multiple intersecting stigmas among low-income, racial/ethnic minority individuals to improve retention in methadone treatment.

Effective medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) are approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of people with opioid use disorder; however, only a small fraction of patients who would benefit from these medications actually use them. Several reasons contribute to low MOUD use, including lack of insurance; lack of knowledge about the medications, both among patients and providers; stigma associated with MOUD; and social norms. Innovative methods are needed to help increase MOUD use. One such option is peer-led interventions that might increase patients’ interest in MOUD. One existing peer-led intervention is the Harnessing Online Peer Education (HOPE) online community intervention that has been designed to reduce stigma and increase health behavior change among stigmatized populations, such as people living with HIV. This project will investigate whether and how HOPE can be adapted for people with opioid use disorder. It will assess whether HOPE can effectively increase MOUD requests, MOUD uptake, and sustained adherence to MOUD as well as reduce overdose rates.