Funded Projects

FDA-approved medications for treating opioid use disorder are effective, but there is a significant unmet need for alternatives, especially relapse prevention. NIDA and the FDA have encouraged investigators to expand the range of therapeutic outcomes, beyond measurement of abstinence. Insomnia is a clinically significant, but understudied, correlate/predictor of relapse to substance use. Yet most medications for treating insomnia have limited efficacy and can produce side effects. The orexin (OX) system plays a key role in sleep and substance use, offering a promising avenue for study. This project will address whether OX-1/2 antagonism is a mechanism that can directly improve outpatient opioid abstinence, or whether OX antagonism corrects sleep deficiencies and indirectly improves opioid abstinence. Specific aims are to determine whether nightly treatment with the OX-1/2 antagonist suvorexant, relative to placebo, 1) increases outpatient opioid abstinence and 2) improves sleep efficiency on the residential detoxification unit. The study will also determine 3) whether improved sleep efficiency predicts greater opioid abstinence (regardless of group assignment).

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a chronic and relapsing brain disease that affects over 2 million Americans. Despite effective evidence-based treatments in the form of behavioral interventions and FDA-approved medication for addiction treatment (MAT), relapse rates are high. The Collaboration Linking Opioid Use Disorder and Sleep Study will investigate patients on MAT to elucidate potential causal mechanisms between sleep deficiency and OUD. The aims of this study are to 1) test whether there are different neurocognitive connectivity patterns between patients with adequate vs. deficient sleep in brain systems involved in addiction and assess the extent to which these “neural fingerprints” predict ongoing opioid use; 2) evaluate the potential biologic, psychiatric, and pharmacologic mechanisms that explain the causal pathway between sleep deficiency and opioid use; and 3) test ecologic factors such as psychosocial, family, and neighborhood contextual factors associated with OUD and their contribution to sleep deficiency among patients in MAT.

The Coordinating Center (CC) will provide centralized logistical support and facilitate communication and coordination of activities across the cooperative. The CC will provide scientific leadership, which will include providing scientific expertise in the areas of implementation research and economic evaluation. The CC will establish an infrastructure for cross-site data collection, management, harmonization, and data sharing and provide expert methodological and statistical consultation.

This study will refine and test a collaborative care model for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, or an anxiety disorder in primary care. The primary aims of the study are: (1) prototype and test elements of the research team’s collaborative care models; (2) conduct a randomized study of three collaborative care conditions to determine which is most effective in improving outcomes for people with OUD and mental health conditions: Augmented Usual Care, Collaborative Care, or Collaborative Care + Social Worker; (3) measure clinician and organizational-level factors associated with implementation to increase success; (4) conduct a cost evaluation of each collaborative care model; and (5) work with smaller and rural practices to develop and test effective strategies to manage OUD. Successful completion of this study will provide evidence regarding the elements of integrated collaborative care required to maximize outcomes for individuals with OUD and psychiatric disorders.

In 2015–2016, there were over 2 million adults with an opioid use disorder (OUD); 62% had a co-occurring mental illness and 24% had a co-occurring serious mental illness. Despite the effectiveness of treatment, many individuals never receive it, and when treatment is provided, quality is low. This is a critical treatment gap in a vulnerable and stigmatized population. Collaborative care (CC) aims to address these gaps by improving access, quality, and outcomes in primary care patients with common mental health conditions. However, CC has never been tested with co-occurring disorders (COD). In the team’s CC model for COD (CC-COD), the CC team includes a behavioral health psychotherapist, medications for OUD, pharmacotherapy for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), motivational interviewing (MI), problem-solving therapy, and Seeking Safety. A multisite, randomized pragmatic trial will be conducted to adapt, harmonize, and then test whether CC-COD improves access, quality, and outcomes for patients with comorbid OUD and depression and/or PTSD.

The emergency department (ED) is an ideal venue to reach and intervene with adolescents and young adults (ages 16-30) at risk for opioid misuse, particularly as young adults may disconnect from primary care when transitioning out of pediatric medicine. This study will evaluate the efficacy of interventions of varying type/intensity to prevent/reduce opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). The research leverages technology that is appealing to youth to facilitate intervention delivery by health coaches. In this study, adolescents and young adults in the ED screening positive for opioid use or misuse will be randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions with outcomes measured at 4, 8, and 12 months. Technology-driven, scalable interventions delivered via health coach allow for real-time tailoring to the rapidly changing opioid epidemic, with the potential for a sustainable impact on preventing escalation of opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults.

Adolescents and young adults in justice settings (AYAJS) have some of the highest rates of opioid use disorder (OUD), with national rates approaching 20%. Multiple studies have established effectiveness of the Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach with Assertive Continuing Care (ACRA/ACC) in reducing non-opioid substance use disorder (SUD); however, none have evaluated it as an OUD prevention strategy. SUD is common and costly among AYAJS; thus, ACRA/ACC-based approaches are likely to be effective and cost-beneficial OUD prevention strategies for this group. However, the optimal intensity of an ACRA/ACC-based OUD prevention intervention for AYAJS with and without non-opioid SUD is not known, as these groups are likely to have differing prevention needs. Seattle Children’s Hospital (SCH), University of Washington (UW), and Washington State Juvenile Rehabilitation (WSJR) will collaboratively evaluate ACRA/ACC-based OUD prevention strategies of different intensity levels among SUD and non-SUD youth.

The national public health opioid crisis has disproportionately burdened rural white populations and American Indian populations. To address this crisis, the Cherokee Nation and Emory University public health scientists will carry out an opioid prevention trial to be conducted in at-risk rural communities in the Cherokee Nation (in northeast Oklahoma) with populations of white and American Indian adolescents and young adults. The study will expand and integrate two established intervention approaches, consisting of community organizing and universal school-based brief intervention and referral to further enhance their effects in preventing and reducing opioid misuse. These interventions, called CMCA and CONNECT, were originally designed to target adolescent alcohol use, but showed significant beneficial effects on use of other drugs, including prescription drug misuse. The expanded, integrated interventions will be tested in a community-randomized trial with the goal of new systems for sustained implementation within existing structures of the Cherokee Nation.

Juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth represent a particularly vulnerable population for substance use and substance use disorders (SUDs), because they often experience mental health disorders, dysfunctional family/social relationships, and complex trauma. This study will adapt and test an intervention for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older JJ-involved youth aging out of JJ (16-18 years), who are transitioning to their communities after a period of detainment in a secure treatment or correctional facility. Trust-Based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®, a relational, attachment-based intervention that promotes emotional regulation through interaction with responsive adults) will be adapted as a prevention intervention targeting youth at risk for substance use, especially non-medical use of opioids. Safe adults (e.g., parent/guardian) will be trained in behavior management techniques for empowering youth to appropriately express their needs, connecting them with others in pro-social ways, and correcting or reshaping undesirable behavior.

Despite psychopathology robustly increasing the risk for later substance use disorders (SUD), remarkably few studies have examined the impact of treating psychopathology on reducing rates of opioid use disorder (OUD), nicotine, and SUD. The main aims of this study are to implement a pragmatic set of office-based instrumentation using patient related outcome measures linked to electronic health records (EPIC) for intake and follow-up assessments to evaluate psychopathology, OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in young people aged 16-30 years old who are receiving psychopathology treatment as part of routine outpatient clinical care. The study will also examine similar age patients with non-opioid SUD in outpatient SUD treatment settings to examine the impact of treatment in mitigating the development of OUD. Data derived from this study will help inform clinical guidelines and public health policy and provide important secondary outcomes for further work on the prevention of OUD, nicotine use disorder, and other SUDs in relation to early-onset psychopathology.

Drug checking services provide individuals who use drugs with information about the true contents of their purchases, and thus may help prevent overdoses. However, current technologies are either costly, technically complex, and non-portable or subject to false signals and restricted in their detection capabilities. This project will continue development of a new, simple-to-use, point-of-care analytical technology (DoseCheck) that can rapidly detect established drug threats in a sample and recognize newly emerging drugs. The project will also attempt to adapt DoseCheck to provide rapid results in emergency overdose situations and improve the analytical capabilities of medical examiners in under-resourced jurisdictions.

The emergency department (ED) is an ideal venue to reach and intervene with adolescents and young adults at risk for opioid misuse, particularly as young adults may disconnect from primary care when transitioning out of pediatric medicine. This study will evaluate the efficacy of interventions of varying type/intensity to prevent/reduce opioid misuse or opioid use disorder (OUD). The research leverages technology that is appealing to youth to facilitate intervention delivery by health coaches. In this study, adolescents and young adults in the ED screening positive for opioid use or misuse will be randomly assigned to one of four intervention conditions with outcomes measured at 4, 8, and 12 months. Technology-driven, scalable interventions delivered via health coach allow for real-time tailoring to the rapidly changing opioid epidemic, with the potential for a sustainable impact on preventing escalation of opioid misuse among adolescents and young adults. While we know that Black/African American youth are at increased risk for opioid and other substance use, they often do not participate in research studies. As a result, we do not know how well prevention interventions work with Black/African American individuals. This supplement will focus on increasing participant diversity and inclusion by recruiting additional Black/African American participants for this ongoing randomized controlled trial to study technology-driven prevention interventions.

The U.S. is in the midst of an opioid crisis, and efforts to tackle the complex and dynamic nature of this public health challenge must comprehensively consider a multitude of contributing factors. In response, states have implemented a wide range of policies and initiatives. However, the dynamic nature of the crisis and the speed with which different policy approaches are being implemented pose numerous challenges for researchers evaluating the effects of such efforts. These challenges stem in part from limited information regarding policy implementation; insufficient information about policy characteristics that may influence effectiveness; little consideration of how the chosen analytic method may influence findings, given simultaneous or concurrent implementation of multiple policies; and limited training on how to best communicate findings to policymakers. To address these challenges, the proposed Center for Opioid Policy Research (COPR) will serve as a national resource, fostering innovative and high-quality research in the opioid policy arena and developing and disseminating methods, tools and information to the research community, policymakers and the public.