Funded Projects

This study will evaluate the implementation of the Zero Suicide framework across six health systems serving over nine million people in collaboration with the Mental Health Research Network. The project will incorporate the voice of the patient and provider stakeholders as part of the implementation of the Zero Suicide framework in three health settings from the NIMH-funded parent award as well as the Southcentral Foundation which is an Alaska Native-owned, nonprofit health care organization serving nearly 65,000 American Indian/Alaskan Native people living in and around Anchorage, Alaska. The team will first systematically engage patients, providers, national consumer advocacy groups, and MHRN scientists in formulating research questions to address the prevention of opioid-related overdoses in people with Opioid Use Disorders (OUD) or people without diagnosed OUD who are using opioids for pain management. Next, the team will utilize semi-structured interviews to determine how people with OUD or people without diagnosed OUD who are using opioids for pain management are experiencing the implementation of the Zero Suicide framework in four diverse health systems. Experiences will be recorded using 80 semi-structured phone interviews in a diverse sample of patients who have survived an opioid-related overdose (50% intentional; 50% unintentional), as well as 20 Addiction Medicine, Primary Care, and/or Specialty Pain Medicine providers.

The project will address gaps in both risk identification and clinical management by utilizing comprehensive clinical data from a mature health information exchange containing more than 2.3 million patients across the spectrum of clinical care (hospitals, primary care, specialty care, community health centers, urgent care) to develop a statistically robust method to measure suicide risk associated with prescription opioid use. First, the team will couple data fusion techniques with machine learning-based approaches in identifying the clinical and demographic characteristics associated with elevated risk of suicidal behavior among prescription opioid users. Second, the team will develop clinical profiles of patients with higher risk of suicidal behavior associated with prescription opioids, and to incorporate these profiles in a clinical decision support platform that can be used for identification and intervention at the point of care. The clinical decision support tool developed under this proposal will provide a generalizable platform that could be extended to other more conventional opioid related outcomes such as OUD and overdose.

The project will apply natural language processing to a rich repository of suicide and other clinical electronic health record and vital statistics to detect opioid problem-related encounters in order to (1) explore the relation between suicide risk and opioid misuse and (2) test whether a Zero Suicide model?s intervention effect is moderated by opioid misuse and whether it can also help to reduce opioid-related harm. First, the team will extract opioid-related EHR data using a combination of diagnostic codes and natural language processing, validated by structured manual chart review using a standardized procedure. Next, they will analyze the interplay between suicide risk and opioid problems in encounters and patients within the repository. Third, they will assess the effect of Zero Suicide implementation on prospective fatal and non-fatal suicidal behavior in patients with an opioid problem and examine whether the implementation had an effect on the incidence of opioid-related outcomes, including intentional overdose.

Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) represents the gold-standard intervention for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, only 20% of Americans with OUD received any formal or informal addiction treatment in the past year. Lack of access and engagement in MAT is driving poor OUD outcomes, especially in rural areas lacking specialty addiction services. The Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center at the University of Washington has successfully helped over a thousand primary care clinics across the country implement collaborative care for mental health disorders. The study will determine whether collaborative care can be used to successfully treat mental health disorders and OUD concurrently in primary care settings. Clinics offering collaborative care will randomize sites to add OUD to their collaborative care program or remain unchanged. Clinics not offering collaborative care will randomize sites to implementing collaborative care for OUD and mental health disorders simultaneously or for mental health disorders only.

This study will refine and test a collaborative care model for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) and major depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, or an anxiety disorder in primary care. The primary aims of the study are: (1) prototype and test elements of the research team’s collaborative care models; (2) conduct a randomized study of three collaborative care conditions to determine which is most effective in improving outcomes for people with OUD and mental health conditions: Augmented Usual Care, Collaborative Care, or Collaborative Care + Social Worker; (3) measure clinician and organizational-level factors associated with implementation to increase success; (4) conduct a cost evaluation of each collaborative care model; and (5) work with smaller and rural practices to develop and test effective strategies to manage OUD. Successful completion of this study will provide evidence regarding the elements of integrated collaborative care required to maximize outcomes for individuals with OUD and psychiatric disorders.

Mortality and morbidity related to suicidal behavior and opioid use disorder (OUD) have increased significantly over the past decade. These two public health crises are intertwined at multiple levels. Medications for OUD, especially buprenorphine, have been shown to decrease opioid use and reduce the multiple negative consequences of OUD, including fatal and nonfatal overdose, criminal justice involvement, infectious complications, and misuse of other substances. In addition, small randomized trials of buprenorphine treatment in treatment-resistant depression (with or without co-occurring OUD) suggest that buprenorphine reduces depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation. This large study will evaluate the effects of starting buprenorphine treatment on self-harm and suicide attempt among people with opioid use disorder, including those with and without co-occurring mental health conditions or other known risk factors for suicidal behavior. Comprehensive health records data from four large health systems serving a combined member/patient population of approximately 11 million will be examined for the overall effect of buprenorphine treatment on subsequent self-harm or suicide attempt, including differences in effects between patient subgroups and specificity of effects to buprenorphine vs other medications.

Opioid use disproportionally affects people with co-occurring mental health disorders. Although medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) is the gold standard of care, engagement rates are low. Also, it is unclear whether addition of one or more behavioral interventions improves outcomes of MOUD treatment, particularly in patients with co-occurring mental health disorders. This project evaluates the effectiveness of the “Maintaining Independence and Sobriety through Systems Integration, Outreach and Networking (MISSION)” intervention—a multi-component, cross-disciplinary, team-based treatment approach that combines three evidence-based practices with MOUD—in people with co-occurring mental health disorders. The 4-year, five-arm, randomized controlled clinical trial will determine the therapeutic benefit of adding MISSION to MOUD and identify the MISSION components that yield the largest clinical improvement and offer the greatest return on investment.

Substance use disorders (SUDs) can have devastating consequences for people with serious mental illness (SMI). SUDs can increase morbidity and mortality and are associated with higher healthcare and social costs, homelessness, and incarceration. Unfortunately, despite the availability of effective treatments, most individuals with co-occurring SMI and SUD (COD) never receive SUD treatment. We propose to evaluate system, provider, and patient-level facilitators and barriers and develop an implementation strategy and toolkit to promote the use of medication-assisted treatment (MAT) for people with COD. Aims 1–3 seek to assess organizational capacity (at the system and provider level); organizational readiness (at the provider level); and perceived needs, attitudes, and preferences (at the patient level) to identify barriers and facilitators. In Aim 4, we will use findings from Aims 1–3 to guide development of the implementation strategy and toolkit, using stakeholder input and a systematic process for strategy development.

The United States is in the middle of two intertwined epidemics. Suicide and overdose deaths are at record levels. Opioid use disorder and mental illness are major contributors to both, with the highest death rates seen in people with co-occurring disorders (COD). This competitive revision tests whether enhancements to the collaborative care (CC) model adapted for co-occurring disorders improves retention in medication treatment and decreases suicide and overdose risk. The three additional components include: (1) education of family members about addiction and medication treatment; (2) training for family members to administer naloxone and on how to reduce opioid risk behaviors, and (3) implementation of Caring Contacts, a suicide prevention intervention. This study will examine patient and family member attitudes toward overdose education and naloxone in the population with COD; examine and then intervene with family members around patients? use of medication; and test in the COD population the effectiveness of universal suicide and overdose prevention programs.